I think that article by R Mutt (2.00 / 0) #18 Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 12:34:25 PM EST
Illustrates Wikipedia's tendency to be provide evenly balanced arguments when the actual evidence is heavily weighted one way.

The "Effects on humans" section basically just talks about the normal ill-effects of being overweight. When it does cite actual scientific papers about calorie-reduced life-extension in humans it's papers like this: "Why dietary restriction substantially increases longevity in animal models but won't in humans."

That paper bears out the earlier point: there's a trade-off between fast reproduction and longevity. Humans have already traded off for that: we reproduce very slowly and live very long lives. Any life-extension effects of this in humans are likely to be noexistent or very small.

[ Parent ]

When I'll have time by ucblockhead (4.00 / 1) #19 Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 12:55:09 PM EST
I'll dig up more concrete stuff. It really is pretty well accepted these days.
----
ウセーバラケダ
[ Parent ]

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password: