I hadn't really thought about new world silver like that before. Can you also view it as a symptom of the economy itself expanding, through colonisation? The Political Science Department of the University of Woolloomooloo
However, compared to the total amount of silver around, that wouldn't necessarily have been that big a deal.
Suppose that the old world had been mining 1 million units per year for a thousand years: that would mean there's a billion units in circulation. Even if the new world mines instantaneously expanded production to 10 million units per year, that's only an inflation rate of 1 percent. Tiny.
Economists always seem to use Spanish silver and gold inflation as an example of the problems of Mercantilism, but Eakin doesn't mention it at all. Maybe it's just a myth?
On "Guns, Germs and Steel": I might read it sometime when I've got a smaller to-read list. As you know I'm not a big fan of the "Non-historian discovers Universal Laws of History which back up all his beliefs" genre. Maybe one day I'll just grit my teeth and do "Guns, Germs and Steel", Samuel Huntingdon's "The Clash of Civilizations" and Peter Turchin's "War and Peace and War" back to back. Might be worth it for the snark value alone ;-)--"Everything is vague to a degree you do not realize till you have tried to make it precise." -- Bertrand Russell[ Parent ]
They originally credit it to Adam Smith. I've looked through the Wealth of Nations and he does talk about a modest fall in silver prices due to the new world mines. He doesn't seem to think it was a disaster though. In fact he explicitly says that this doesn't affect interest rates. He goes on quite a bit about how since money is only valuable for what it can purchase, so this effect isn't that important.
Those articles cite as evidence:
It's interesting to hear Adam Smith's take ...
The quick google searches on the same topic seem to see the use of silver as a symptom of Ming commercialism. Eg. The Political Science Department of the University of Woolloomooloo[ Parent ]